Director Tamilla Woodard on Top Girls (Part Two)

-
By Elspeth Sweatman 

A year after bringing the rip-roaring adventure Men on Boats to the Strand, Director Tamilla Woodard is back at A.C.T. with Caryl Churchill’s 1982 play Top Girls.

Director Tamilla Woodard (left) and A.C.T. Artistic Director Pam MacKinnon (right) discuss Top Girls. Photo by Claire L. Wong.

What’s your process as a director? Do you like to do research?
Any play I do, I go as deep as I can. Of course, I think that’s simply part of the job. The more you dig, the more you find and the more you find, the more you need to keep looking. I want to surround myself with as many tools as I can, not out of studiousness but to communicate about the play. First and foremost, I need to satisfy my questions so I go until I run out of time [Laughs] which 99.9 percent of the time is what happens. All of that is fuel for my imagination and decision-making.
One of the things that I do with a play is I sit down and write just pages and pages of the things that are indisputable about the world of the play. It’s Monday morning. This is the first day back at the office after the news of Marlene’s promotion. Or it’s Sunday, the day before Angie will take the bus by herself to London to see Marlene. It’s been a year since Marlene visited. These are the bones of the world. I try not to have giant philosophical questions such as “Why did Caryl Churchill write this play?” but questions like, “How much older is Joyce than Marlene? What are these Mahayana Sutras that Lady Nijo copied? Where is Tobermory? How far is Ipswich from London?” Real, practical questions that will help all of us make the world grounded. I write all those questions out, and then I ask the actors to write all their questions out too. We put them on the wall and then we try to check them off the list as we know more about the play. The stuff that isn’t in the play, I say to the whole company, “This is the stuff we get to make up. This is what makes it our production.”

Director Tamilla Woodard addresses the cast and creative team of Top Girls. Photo by Claire L. Wong.

Even in 2019, there are still rules that we as women unconsciously abide by. We tend not to stand up for ourselves because we don’t want to be labeled as aggressive. We feel that we can’t leave the house without makeup on. When you take a step back, these are nonsense rules designed to keep us confined.
We’re talking about supremacy a lot in my circles. When the value or worth of something is defined by its resemblance to a dominant cultural experience, that’s supremacy. When women no longer need to define themselves in reference to maleness—not as “the opposite sex” or “a guy would never do it like this” or “man up” and so on—when we can think outside of systems of supremacy where something is defined by its proximity to the more accepted thing, then we can imagine a new world.
We have to unmoor ourselves. I’m thinking about imagination and invention and not reimagination or reinvention; take the “re” away from things. We have old systems that we keep referencing and we think that we can use the old system and turn it into something different. No. There’s no rehabilitation. We have to be fearless about bringing forward a new way of doing.

This interview is excerpted from the Top Girls issue of Words on Plays. Want to read more? Order your copy here. Get your tickets to Top Girls now!

Popular posts from this blog

“To Be or Not to Be”: The Iconic Speech’s Origins, Interpretations, and Impact

-
Image
By A.C.T. Publications Staff The opening line of Hamlet ’s “To be or not to be” soliloquy is theater’s most iconic, most referenced quote. What’s less known is the famous speech’s history, with Hamlet ’s earliest publications offering varying versions of its language. Also questioned is its meaning—is Hamlet contemplating suicide or is he weighing the consequences of murder? Though definitive answers are unlikely to arise, the questions “To be or not to be” asks have kept audiences, scholars, and actors engaged for centuries. Hamlet ’ s "To be or not to be" speech as it appears in the three original editions of the play. Photo by Georgelazenby. Courtesy Wikimedia Commons. The first edition, or First Quarto (Q1), of Hamlet was published in 1603. Because the text is much shorter than later editions and its language is less poetic, it is nicknamed the “Bad Quarto” by scholars. “To be or not to be” in Q1 reads as: To be, or not to be—ay, there’s the point. To die, ...
Read more

The American Sound: The Evolution of Jazz

-
Image
By Cecilia Padilla There is nothing so uniquely American as jazz music. In its simplest form, jazz embodies the essence of the American people: bold and inventive. The improvisation of the jazz ensemble can even be seen as a metaphor for the American democratic ideal: musicians playing solos have the liberty to express themselves as long as they adhere to the overall structure of the tune—individual freedom but with responsibility to the group. The evolution of jazz music also carries with it the social development of our nation from slavery to the swinging songs of World War II. Musically, jazz contributed immensely to the way contemporary musicians approach instrumentation, composition, and vocal arrangements. It is difficult to find a popular tune today that does not derive from such jazz icons as Joe Oliver, Louis Armstrong, Duke Ellington, and Thelonious Monk. Jazz is the great equalizer; for more than a hundred years, it has been the common ground between blacks and whites, me...
Read more

A Hell of a Businessman: A Biography of Joe Glaser

-
By Simon Hodgson Born in 1897, Joe Glaser was the son of a successful Russian Jewish physician in Chicago. He originally intended to follow a similar career and entered medical school, but after passing out in the operating room, he realized he wasn’t cut out to be a doctor. He started off in business selling used cars, but found better luck managing prizefighters. In his biography of Al Capone, Laurence Bergreen notes, “Glaser’s power to fix fights earned him a reputation as a sage of boxing, especially among reporters.” With advanced word as to which fights were fixed, Glaser could predict the results—and even the number of rounds—of many bouts in Chicago. His connections with organized crime continued in his next career change, when he began running nightclubs and whorehouses in the South Side for the Chicago Outfit, the powerful underworld gang led by Capone. Glaser’s tendency toward illegal action nearly ended his career. In 1928, he was sentenced to ten years in prison for ...
Read more