Director Tamilla Woodard on Top Girls (Part One)

-
By Elspeth Sweatman

A year after bringing the rip-roaring adventure Men on Boats to the Strand, Director Tamilla Woodard is back at A.C.T. with Caryl Churchill’s 1982 play Top Girls.

Director Tamilla Woodard describes her vision for Top Girls. Photo by Claire L. Wong.

Men on Boats, which you directed last fall at the Strand, upended stereotypes, and in a way, Top Girls is doing something similar. These are powerful female characters, but they are all still trapped inside the patriarchy. 
They are responding to the invisible presence of men. It’s like there are only women onstage but there’s a big man head hanging above them, looking down at them. [Laughs] Jaclyn [Backhaus] tackled stereotypes in Men on Boats by having no men and no mention of the fact that these female-identified bodies were playing men; men disappeared entirely. Here, no men appear onstage but man-ness is ever present. Masculinity is present. Patriarchy is present. These women are under the weight of that, even if they can’t see it themselves. They’re reacting to it, shackled to it, and, in some instances, affirming it. Each is not as free an agent as she imagines herself to be.

 It sounds like there’s a natural progression from Men on Boats to Top Girls. How did Top Girls come about?
It was actually a proposal from [A.C.T. Artistic Director] Pam [MacKinnon]. She’s a smart lady, so I listen! Since Men on Boats closed, I’d been thinking of what play I wanted to propose to Pam. I was looking at many plays, trying to figure out what kind of play would succeed in a space like the Geary that’s not just a physical space but a space of dialogue with the audience. The Bay Area is very particular, and A.C.T.’s audiences are particular. What will resonate with them? I’m still asking this question with Top Girls. What are the most resonant things in this play for this audience today. 

 Top Girls explores success and how each character defines success. What does success mean to you?
Gosh, I have trouble with that word. Success feels like a thing you check off the list and then you’re done. I prefer to live in a continuum where you’re learning more things, getting more tools, letting go of old things to try new things. Success to me is if, at the end of the day, I’ve managed to quell my own doubts, follow my curiosity, and take a chance on something I think might just kill me if it fails. Success is reckoning with my fear and accepting abundance; every step is a tug of war between those two things so to get to the end of the day and feel like, “I did that, I made that, I said this, I talked to this person, I was kind, I accepted kindness, I cried today, I laughed today. I didn’t hide, or I only hid for a little bit. [Laughs] I gave some love and I received love.” I made it through this day being terrified to move forward but I moved forward. That’s success. Fortune is a thing that I embrace. I feel fortunate to have had the opportunity of this day, which I will never see again. This day. We’ll never see again. So I’m just grateful for it. 

This interview is excerpted from the Top Girls issue of Words on Plays. Want to read more? Order your copy here. Be on the lookout for part two of this interview, in which Woodard discusses her directorial process, and get your tickets to Top Girls now!

Popular posts from this blog

“To Be or Not to Be”: The Iconic Speech’s Origins, Interpretations, and Impact

-
Image
By A.C.T. Publications Staff The opening line of Hamlet ’s “To be or not to be” soliloquy is theater’s most iconic, most referenced quote. What’s less known is the famous speech’s history, with Hamlet ’s earliest publications offering varying versions of its language. Also questioned is its meaning—is Hamlet contemplating suicide or is he weighing the consequences of murder? Though definitive answers are unlikely to arise, the questions “To be or not to be” asks have kept audiences, scholars, and actors engaged for centuries. Hamlet ’ s "To be or not to be" speech as it appears in the three original editions of the play. Photo by Georgelazenby. Courtesy Wikimedia Commons. The first edition, or First Quarto (Q1), of Hamlet was published in 1603. Because the text is much shorter than later editions and its language is less poetic, it is nicknamed the “Bad Quarto” by scholars. “To be or not to be” in Q1 reads as: To be, or not to be—ay, there’s the point. To die, ...
Read more

The American Sound: The Evolution of Jazz

-
Image
By Cecilia Padilla There is nothing so uniquely American as jazz music. In its simplest form, jazz embodies the essence of the American people: bold and inventive. The improvisation of the jazz ensemble can even be seen as a metaphor for the American democratic ideal: musicians playing solos have the liberty to express themselves as long as they adhere to the overall structure of the tune—individual freedom but with responsibility to the group. The evolution of jazz music also carries with it the social development of our nation from slavery to the swinging songs of World War II. Musically, jazz contributed immensely to the way contemporary musicians approach instrumentation, composition, and vocal arrangements. It is difficult to find a popular tune today that does not derive from such jazz icons as Joe Oliver, Louis Armstrong, Duke Ellington, and Thelonious Monk. Jazz is the great equalizer; for more than a hundred years, it has been the common ground between blacks and whites, me...
Read more

A Hell of a Businessman: A Biography of Joe Glaser

-
By Simon Hodgson Born in 1897, Joe Glaser was the son of a successful Russian Jewish physician in Chicago. He originally intended to follow a similar career and entered medical school, but after passing out in the operating room, he realized he wasn’t cut out to be a doctor. He started off in business selling used cars, but found better luck managing prizefighters. In his biography of Al Capone, Laurence Bergreen notes, “Glaser’s power to fix fights earned him a reputation as a sage of boxing, especially among reporters.” With advanced word as to which fights were fixed, Glaser could predict the results—and even the number of rounds—of many bouts in Chicago. His connections with organized crime continued in his next career change, when he began running nightclubs and whorehouses in the South Side for the Chicago Outfit, the powerful underworld gang led by Capone. Glaser’s tendency toward illegal action nearly ended his career. In 1928, he was sentenced to ten years in prison for ...
Read more