M.F.A. Second-Year Actors Stretch Their Skills with The Changeling

-
By Taylor Steinbeck

Love. Lust. Murder. Morality. These are just a handful of themes that the seventeenth-century tragedy, The Changeling, takes on over the course of five acts. Written by Thomas Middleton and William Rowley, this complex classical text was handpicked for the M.F.A. Program’s Class of 2020. “Revenge tragedy is not about dry wit—it’s really visceral” says Conservatory Director Melissa Smith. “This class of actors has the emotional range and the temperaments to tackle this play.” Opening at The Rueff this Thursday, The Changeling is sure to challenge its talented performers to rise to the occasion.

Show artwork for the M.F.A. Program's production of The Changeling. 
Director Nancy Benjamin, A.C.T.’s head of voice and dialect, is well aware of the intricacy of the language. “Working with classical text and its heightened, poetic, rhetorical language is an enormous challenge for any actor,” says Benjamin. “The dexterity, precision, and energy required to deliver the complex thoughts and passions of these sweeping stories takes time and practice to develop.” Second-year actor Ash Malloy—who plays the show’s lead, Beatrice—is more than ready to stretch her acting muscles. “It's been really exciting to work on a character who has such a fantastic range,” says Malloy. “Beatrice possesses an arc an actor rarely gets. She’s this incredible pseudo-hybrid of Juliet and Lady Macbeth.”

The process of mining The Changeling’s text has not only been beneficial to Malloy’s craft, but has also tested her as a student. With rehearsals requiring extensive script analysis, the production has proven an enriching educational opportunity for the M.F.A. actors. “I have learned so much about the power of language,” says Malloy. “Classical language has a forward momentum that can drive a plot at 100 miles an hour. And unlike contemporary scripts, there is no subtext in classical text. It feels vulnerable to allow everything to live above ground—it’s unforgiving—but I think it’s making me a better actor.” 

Though The Changeling was penned over 400 years ago, many of its ideas still resonate today. “The play is about reckless, selfish people in power behaving badly,” says Benjamin. “How fitting for our time, when it feels as if ego, not vision, is governing our lives and impacting our futures.” Similarly, Malloy hopes that theatergoers will leave The Strand reflecting on the consequences of the characters’ immoral actions, and what they would have done in similar circumstances. “We want audiences to recognize the cost of privilege. What does it mean to have power and how do you use it responsibly?” asks Malloy. “I hope this production will inspire those who watch it to live more conscientiously and compassionately, with eyes wide open to even the ugliest parts of themselves.”

The Changeling runs November 9–18 at The Rueff at A.C.T.’s Strand Theater, 1127 Market Street, San Francisco. Click here to purchase tickets.

Popular posts from this blog

“To Be or Not to Be”: The Iconic Speech’s Origins, Interpretations, and Impact

-
Image
By A.C.T. Publications Staff The opening line of Hamlet ’s “To be or not to be” soliloquy is theater’s most iconic, most referenced quote. What’s less known is the famous speech’s history, with Hamlet ’s earliest publications offering varying versions of its language. Also questioned is its meaning—is Hamlet contemplating suicide or is he weighing the consequences of murder? Though definitive answers are unlikely to arise, the questions “To be or not to be” asks have kept audiences, scholars, and actors engaged for centuries. Hamlet ’ s "To be or not to be" speech as it appears in the three original editions of the play. Photo by Georgelazenby. Courtesy Wikimedia Commons. The first edition, or First Quarto (Q1), of Hamlet was published in 1603. Because the text is much shorter than later editions and its language is less poetic, it is nicknamed the “Bad Quarto” by scholars. “To be or not to be” in Q1 reads as: To be, or not to be—ay, there’s the point. To die,
Read more

The American Sound: The Evolution of Jazz

-
Image
By Cecilia Padilla There is nothing so uniquely American as jazz music. In its simplest form, jazz embodies the essence of the American people: bold and inventive. The improvisation of the jazz ensemble can even be seen as a metaphor for the American democratic ideal: musicians playing solos have the liberty to express themselves as long as they adhere to the overall structure of the tune—individual freedom but with responsibility to the group. The evolution of jazz music also carries with it the social development of our nation from slavery to the swinging songs of World War II. Musically, jazz contributed immensely to the way contemporary musicians approach instrumentation, composition, and vocal arrangements. It is difficult to find a popular tune today that does not derive from such jazz icons as Joe Oliver, Louis Armstrong, Duke Ellington, and Thelonious Monk. Jazz is the great equalizer; for more than a hundred years, it has been the common ground between blacks and whites, me
Read more

A Hell of a Businessman: A Biography of Joe Glaser

-
By Simon Hodgson Born in 1897, Joe Glaser was the son of a successful Russian Jewish physician in Chicago. He originally intended to follow a similar career and entered medical school, but after passing out in the operating room, he realized he wasn’t cut out to be a doctor. He started off in business selling used cars, but found better luck managing prizefighters. In his biography of Al Capone, Laurence Bergreen notes, “Glaser’s power to fix fights earned him a reputation as a sage of boxing, especially among reporters.” With advanced word as to which fights were fixed, Glaser could predict the results—and even the number of rounds—of many bouts in Chicago. His connections with organized crime continued in his next career change, when he began running nightclubs and whorehouses in the South Side for the Chicago Outfit, the powerful underworld gang led by Capone. Glaser’s tendency toward illegal action nearly ended his career. In 1928, he was sentenced to ten years in prison for
Read more