A Q&A with Love and a Bottle Director Nancy Benjamin

-

A.C.T.'s M.F.A. Program 2016 Production of Love and a Bottle.
 By Stephanie Wilborn

Love and a Bottle, the latest production from A.C.T.’s Master of Fine Arts Program, opens on October 5 at The Strand Theater. Stephanie Wilborn, Education & Community Programs Fellow, sat down for a Q&A with director Nancy Benjamin to discuss Declan Hughes’s adaptation of George Farquhar’s 1697 comedy Love and a Bottle and the complexity of directing a play within a play.

Why did you choose to direct Love and a Bottle?

I saw the play performed in 1992, produced by an Irish company called Rough Magic, a very feminist company. I had never seen this period of theater [late seventeenth century] done in that kind of way. It was fantastic.

Do you believe the way women are treated in this play has any relation to the way women are treated today?

Farquhar, in his own time, was challenging the story that we tell ourselves that “boys will be boys” and women are property. Farquhar saw that and turned it on its head, taking it so far that we are shocked by the violence and the abuse. It reminds me of when I was a kid, hearing the old fairytales about the idiot who finds the golden goose and gets the princess, while she has no say in the matter. Or how Cinderella wins a prince at the ball based on her beauty alone. But we understand now that this is not okay. I think it’s amazing that Farquhar in 1697 was essentially questioning the fairytale that everybody was putting onstage at that time.

Can you describe the heightened language and style of Love and a Bottle?

With heightened language we need to get rid of all notions of style. Because style leads us into false play, causing us to present attitudes rather than people. One of the things I loved about the production that I saw was the rawness and the immediacy of all the characters. They were completely modern—the only difference [between them and us] was their word choice. The characters say things in a way that’s different from the way we would, but the actors find the energy of that speech without adopting a tone or a style of playing. My goal is to get rid of style so there is no separation between the play’s world and our world.

How do you differentiate between the two worlds: the world of Farquhar’s protagonist, Lyrick, who is a young dramatist struggling to write a play, and the world of the play he himself creates within Farquhar’s play?

This is the central challenge of this play. We’ve placed Lyrick on a different platform from Roebuck and the other characters he creates, so when he’s describing the action, those characters enter the space and he tells them what to do. We’re trying to establish for the audience that this man is creating the characters we see. When his landlady comes in, she walks through all of those characters without seeing them, making it clear that the world he’s imagining is not the real world.

The play that Lyrick writes remains unfinished in some ways. Why do you think that is?

He has to stop the story. The story is wrong. That’s the big message we want to convey: Roebuck takes control of the story, and Lyrick realizes it was the wrong story to tell. We just don’t tell stories about women being abused and abandoned. We don’t tell stories about betraying men and calling women whores. If we try, we realize that we’ve messed up in a big way and the story should not, and cannot, be finished.

Love and a Bottle is playing October 5–8 at The Rueff at The Strand Theater, 1127 Market Street, San Francisco. Click here for tickets.

Popular posts from this blog

“To Be or Not to Be”: The Iconic Speech’s Origins, Interpretations, and Impact

-
Image
By A.C.T. Publications Staff The opening line of Hamlet ’s “To be or not to be” soliloquy is theater’s most iconic, most referenced quote. What’s less known is the famous speech’s history, with Hamlet ’s earliest publications offering varying versions of its language. Also questioned is its meaning—is Hamlet contemplating suicide or is he weighing the consequences of murder? Though definitive answers are unlikely to arise, the questions “To be or not to be” asks have kept audiences, scholars, and actors engaged for centuries. Hamlet ’ s "To be or not to be" speech as it appears in the three original editions of the play. Photo by Georgelazenby. Courtesy Wikimedia Commons. The first edition, or First Quarto (Q1), of Hamlet was published in 1603. Because the text is much shorter than later editions and its language is less poetic, it is nicknamed the “Bad Quarto” by scholars. “To be or not to be” in Q1 reads as: To be, or not to be—ay, there’s the point. To die,
Read more

The American Sound: The Evolution of Jazz

-
Image
By Cecilia Padilla There is nothing so uniquely American as jazz music. In its simplest form, jazz embodies the essence of the American people: bold and inventive. The improvisation of the jazz ensemble can even be seen as a metaphor for the American democratic ideal: musicians playing solos have the liberty to express themselves as long as they adhere to the overall structure of the tune—individual freedom but with responsibility to the group. The evolution of jazz music also carries with it the social development of our nation from slavery to the swinging songs of World War II. Musically, jazz contributed immensely to the way contemporary musicians approach instrumentation, composition, and vocal arrangements. It is difficult to find a popular tune today that does not derive from such jazz icons as Joe Oliver, Louis Armstrong, Duke Ellington, and Thelonious Monk. Jazz is the great equalizer; for more than a hundred years, it has been the common ground between blacks and whites, me
Read more

A Hell of a Businessman: A Biography of Joe Glaser

-
By Simon Hodgson Born in 1897, Joe Glaser was the son of a successful Russian Jewish physician in Chicago. He originally intended to follow a similar career and entered medical school, but after passing out in the operating room, he realized he wasn’t cut out to be a doctor. He started off in business selling used cars, but found better luck managing prizefighters. In his biography of Al Capone, Laurence Bergreen notes, “Glaser’s power to fix fights earned him a reputation as a sage of boxing, especially among reporters.” With advanced word as to which fights were fixed, Glaser could predict the results—and even the number of rounds—of many bouts in Chicago. His connections with organized crime continued in his next career change, when he began running nightclubs and whorehouses in the South Side for the Chicago Outfit, the powerful underworld gang led by Capone. Glaser’s tendency toward illegal action nearly ended his career. In 1928, he was sentenced to ten years in prison for
Read more