Small Talk in The Realistic Joneses

-
By Shannon Stockwell

The Realistic Joneses runs until April 3 at A.C.T.'s Geary Theater. 

Jennifer and Bob Jones sit outside their house, talking to each other. Well, it seems like they’re talking, at least by the modern definition of “talking.” Their mouths are moving and their vocal cords are vibrating and one makes a sound that the other hears, interprets, and responds to. But despite the outward appearance that they are, in fact, talking, Jennifer remains unconvinced. “We’re—I don’t know—sort of throwing words at each other,” she says.


Jennifer Jones (Rebecca Watson) and Bob Jones (Rod Gnapp)
try to have a conversation about Bob's deteriorating health.
Photo by Kevin Berne. 
The characters in The Realistic Joneses throw words at each other for the entire play, and the other party often fails to catch them. Questions are asked and remain unanswered. Words are misinterpreted. Topics are dropped. Stutters and false starts abound. It feels as though, for all their existential dread, these characters can’t pull themselves away from small talk in order to get at the bigger fears that pervade their lives.

What exactly is small talk? The academic term is “phatic communication,” which was coined by sociologist Bronisław Malinowski in 1923. Phatic communication, he explains, is when words are exchanged but no particularly important information is conveyed. For example, you might be compelled to comment to a person standing next to you, “It’s so cold today.” The person likely knows that it is cold. No new information is exchanged. But you say it anyway. Why?

Malinowski says, “To a natural man, another man’s silence is not a reassuring factor, but on the contrary, something alarming and dangerous. . . . The breaking of silence, the communion of words is the first act to establish links of fellowship. . . . The modern English expression, ‘Nice day to-day’ [is] needed to get over the strange and unpleasant tension which men feel when facing each other in silence.”

These thoughts were inspiration for Eno as he wrote the play. In an interview with Playbill, he said of The Realistic Joneses, “I wonder, I assume that everyone must have some little moment once in a while where they think what a strange thing this all is, that we have words and there didn’t used to be words and somebody made up all these words and now they’re pouring out of my mouth and I’m telling you what it’s like inside me. And I’m probably not getting close to describing it, but close enough that you can hear it and have some other opinion and respond with how it is inside you.”

“You don’t get what I’m saying,” says John to Bob in The Realistic Joneses. “Not your fault. Words don’t really do it for me anymore, anyway. It’s all just bodies and light.”

 To learn more about small talk in The Realistic Joneses, click here to purchase a printed or digital copy of Words on Plays, A.C.T.'s in-depth performance guide series. All proceeds go to our ACTsmart education programs, serving teachers and students throughout the Bay Area. 



Popular posts from this blog

“To Be or Not to Be”: The Iconic Speech’s Origins, Interpretations, and Impact

-
Image
By A.C.T. Publications Staff The opening line of Hamlet ’s “To be or not to be” soliloquy is theater’s most iconic, most referenced quote. What’s less known is the famous speech’s history, with Hamlet ’s earliest publications offering varying versions of its language. Also questioned is its meaning—is Hamlet contemplating suicide or is he weighing the consequences of murder? Though definitive answers are unlikely to arise, the questions “To be or not to be” asks have kept audiences, scholars, and actors engaged for centuries. Hamlet ’ s "To be or not to be" speech as it appears in the three original editions of the play. Photo by Georgelazenby. Courtesy Wikimedia Commons. The first edition, or First Quarto (Q1), of Hamlet was published in 1603. Because the text is much shorter than later editions and its language is less poetic, it is nicknamed the “Bad Quarto” by scholars. “To be or not to be” in Q1 reads as: To be, or not to be—ay, there’s the point. To die,
Read more

The American Sound: The Evolution of Jazz

-
Image
By Cecilia Padilla There is nothing so uniquely American as jazz music. In its simplest form, jazz embodies the essence of the American people: bold and inventive. The improvisation of the jazz ensemble can even be seen as a metaphor for the American democratic ideal: musicians playing solos have the liberty to express themselves as long as they adhere to the overall structure of the tune—individual freedom but with responsibility to the group. The evolution of jazz music also carries with it the social development of our nation from slavery to the swinging songs of World War II. Musically, jazz contributed immensely to the way contemporary musicians approach instrumentation, composition, and vocal arrangements. It is difficult to find a popular tune today that does not derive from such jazz icons as Joe Oliver, Louis Armstrong, Duke Ellington, and Thelonious Monk. Jazz is the great equalizer; for more than a hundred years, it has been the common ground between blacks and whites, me
Read more

A Hell of a Businessman: A Biography of Joe Glaser

-
By Simon Hodgson Born in 1897, Joe Glaser was the son of a successful Russian Jewish physician in Chicago. He originally intended to follow a similar career and entered medical school, but after passing out in the operating room, he realized he wasn’t cut out to be a doctor. He started off in business selling used cars, but found better luck managing prizefighters. In his biography of Al Capone, Laurence Bergreen notes, “Glaser’s power to fix fights earned him a reputation as a sage of boxing, especially among reporters.” With advanced word as to which fights were fixed, Glaser could predict the results—and even the number of rounds—of many bouts in Chicago. His connections with organized crime continued in his next career change, when he began running nightclubs and whorehouses in the South Side for the Chicago Outfit, the powerful underworld gang led by Capone. Glaser’s tendency toward illegal action nearly ended his career. In 1928, he was sentenced to ten years in prison for
Read more