OSF Artistic Director Bill Rauch Visits A.C.T.

-
By Simon Hodgson 

Bill Rauch is in his ninth season as the artistic director of the Oregon Shakespeare Festival (OSF). While visiting San Francisco for last Thursday’s triumphant opening of the new musical The Unfortunates at The Strand Theater (it premiered at OSF in 2013), he sat down with A.C.T.’s  M.F.A. Program actors for a Q&A moderated by A.C.T. Artistic Director Carey Perloff.

(L-R): M.F.A. Program actor Leonard A. Thomas, A.C.T. Artistic Director Carey Perloff,
and OSF Artistic Director Bill Rauch. Photo by Simon Hodgson. 

Is classical theater training still relevant?

It’s deeply necessary, but it’s becoming more and more rare. At OSF, there’s a tension between casting new work and casting classical plays. Ideally, you want actors who can play contemporary, classical, and musicals too. Real repertory actors are very rare, because it’s a marathon, not a sprint. 

How do you create a season?

At OSF, I was lucky enough to inherit the Boarshead system, where we’ll do readings of potential productions with department heads. When I joined the company, I broadened that circle to include five company members, so we might have a stitcher or a bartender weighing in as well. This means you get great feedback from a range of people across the whole company. The strength of the Boarshead system was brought home to me in my very first season at OSF. As part of expanding the classical canon, I wanted to put on a Sanskrit epic, The Clay Cart, which I love. We have long slots to program and short slots to program, and I was thinking that this play would fit one of those short slots. After all, it’s an Indian play set 2,500 years ago so it may not appeal to everyone. A guy from marketing stood up and said, “This is Bill’s show and he wants to put his stamp on the season. I think we should run it all season!” And he thumped his fist on the table and everyone cheered. And so we did. [As a side note, A.C.T.’s 2016–17 season will include its own Sanskrit drama, Battlefield, directed by the legendary Peter Brook.]

What was the original motivation behind Play On, OSF’s new project of commissioning contemporary English adaptations of Shakespeare’s plays?

To me, the idea of these companion translations is really to get at the specificity of the language. They’re intended to further understanding, rather than to replace the original texts. Shakespeare is the most produced playwright in this country for a reason. But remember: whenever you put on a Shakespeare play, it’s some kind of adaptation. What folio are you using? Which editor’s version? Which dramaturg? Which quarto? For our adaptations, we’re commissioning 38 writers to take a deep dive into Shakespeare. More than half of the writers are women, and more than half are people of color.

While we’re talking about adapting Shakespeare, it’s also worth including a story about how people respond to Shakespeare’s language. When I was at Cornerstone Theater Company [co-founded by Rauch in 1986], we essentially loaded our theater into a truck. We’d go to these tiny rural towns to put on shows. In Marmath, North Dakota [pop. 193] we put on a production of Hamlet with a cast composed of our actors and people from the town. During rehearsals, the ranchers and their wives would really get into discussions about the language. They wanted the play to be comprehensible to everyone, and they would come back to us with questions such as “Why can’t we change this word to something we’d actually say?” It was rewarding and humbling to hear what people thought and the experience made us think about the text a little differently.

At OSF, you are both an artist and an artistic director. What part of your life is most rewarding?

Being a parent is what grounds me—that’s the single most important thing in my life. But if you’d ask me to choose between being the leader that makes decisions about an arts organization and being an artist, I’d choose artist—being in the rehearsal room, doing the work—every time. 


Popular posts from this blog

“To Be or Not to Be”: The Iconic Speech’s Origins, Interpretations, and Impact

-
Image
By A.C.T. Publications Staff The opening line of Hamlet ’s “To be or not to be” soliloquy is theater’s most iconic, most referenced quote. What’s less known is the famous speech’s history, with Hamlet ’s earliest publications offering varying versions of its language. Also questioned is its meaning—is Hamlet contemplating suicide or is he weighing the consequences of murder? Though definitive answers are unlikely to arise, the questions “To be or not to be” asks have kept audiences, scholars, and actors engaged for centuries. Hamlet ’ s "To be or not to be" speech as it appears in the three original editions of the play. Photo by Georgelazenby. Courtesy Wikimedia Commons. The first edition, or First Quarto (Q1), of Hamlet was published in 1603. Because the text is much shorter than later editions and its language is less poetic, it is nicknamed the “Bad Quarto” by scholars. “To be or not to be” in Q1 reads as: To be, or not to be—ay, there’s the point. To die,
Read more

The American Sound: The Evolution of Jazz

-
Image
By Cecilia Padilla There is nothing so uniquely American as jazz music. In its simplest form, jazz embodies the essence of the American people: bold and inventive. The improvisation of the jazz ensemble can even be seen as a metaphor for the American democratic ideal: musicians playing solos have the liberty to express themselves as long as they adhere to the overall structure of the tune—individual freedom but with responsibility to the group. The evolution of jazz music also carries with it the social development of our nation from slavery to the swinging songs of World War II. Musically, jazz contributed immensely to the way contemporary musicians approach instrumentation, composition, and vocal arrangements. It is difficult to find a popular tune today that does not derive from such jazz icons as Joe Oliver, Louis Armstrong, Duke Ellington, and Thelonious Monk. Jazz is the great equalizer; for more than a hundred years, it has been the common ground between blacks and whites, me
Read more

A Hell of a Businessman: A Biography of Joe Glaser

-
By Simon Hodgson Born in 1897, Joe Glaser was the son of a successful Russian Jewish physician in Chicago. He originally intended to follow a similar career and entered medical school, but after passing out in the operating room, he realized he wasn’t cut out to be a doctor. He started off in business selling used cars, but found better luck managing prizefighters. In his biography of Al Capone, Laurence Bergreen notes, “Glaser’s power to fix fights earned him a reputation as a sage of boxing, especially among reporters.” With advanced word as to which fights were fixed, Glaser could predict the results—and even the number of rounds—of many bouts in Chicago. His connections with organized crime continued in his next career change, when he began running nightclubs and whorehouses in the South Side for the Chicago Outfit, the powerful underworld gang led by Capone. Glaser’s tendency toward illegal action nearly ended his career. In 1928, he was sentenced to ten years in prison for
Read more