Eugene O'Neill's Ah, Wilderness!—The Necessary Play
By Michael Paller
By 1931, Eugene O’Neill, the great American tragic playwright,
had won Pulitzer Prizes for Beyond the
Horizon, Anna Christie, and Strange Interlude. He’d written 23
full-length plays, including Anna
Christie, The Hairy Ape, Desire Under the Elms, The Emperor Jones, and All God’s Chillun Got
Wings, which the police in New York attempted to close because it showed a
black man kissing a white woman. That same year saw the debut and critical
acclaim of Mourning Becomes Electra,
his seven-hour Americanization of Aeschylus’s Oresteia set in New England during the Civil War. He was acclaimed—not
without justification—as the creator of the modern American theater.
Before him, American theater had been melodrama, vaudeville,
and star-driven vehicles. With the aid of his collaborators at the Provincetown
Playhouse, he forged an American theater that could aspire to stand beside the
European accomplishments of August Strindberg, Henrik Ibsen, and Anton Chekhov.
Like theirs, his was an experimental theater. In his early plays, O’Neill
employed a host of theatrical conventions, from masks to spoken inner
monologues, and styles, from Naturalism to Expressionism, to peel away the
surface of everyday life and reveal the struggle and torment that he sensed seething
underneath. O’Neill devoted himself to tragedy, striving to make it a viable
genre for the twentieth century.
During the two-year gestation period of Electra, he felt himself encountering the limits of his talents. He
wrote to his friend the drama critic Joseph Wood Krutch, “Oh, for a language to
write drama in! For a speech that is dramatic and isn’t just conversation! . . .
But where to find that language?” Once he was finished with Electra, he feared such a language had
eluded him once again. He didn’t know that the solution soon would present
itself in homey, informal language and in a genre for which he’d had little or
no regard: comedy.
Waiting for fall rehearsals of Electra to get underway in New York, O’Neill and his wife, Carlotta,
took a vacation home in Northport Long Island. When the weather was clear, he
could look across Long Island Sound toward the south shore of Connecticut and
the town of New London, where he’d spent much of his unhappy boyhood and
adolescence. Seized by a sudden desire to see the family house again, he told
Carlotta he wanted to visit the once-thriving seaport town. She was dubious. “Don’t
do it, darling,” she said. “Don’t ever try to go back. Keep your ideas, but
don’t go back.” O’Neill was determined, however, and off they went.
Once there, they couldn’t locate the house, so completely changed
was the neighborhood. When they finally managed to find it down by the water,
they discovered that —of course—someone else was living in it, and had to
settle for a view from across the street. According to Carlotta, O’Neill said,
“I shouldn’t have come. Let’s go away. I don’t want to look at it.” It was back
to Northport where he made a few notes for a play tentatively called Nostalgia, which he stuck in a drawer.
A year later, in September 1932, at his home on Sea Island, Georgia,
O’Neill awoke one morning from a dream in which the whole plot of Ah, Wilderness! unfolded itself. From
seven a.m. till late afternoon he wrote out an entire scenario, and over the
course of six weeks, the play, he said, “simply gushed” out of him. Except for
some cutting, the resulting draft was the final one.
Lit, Song, and Slang
The play reflects three of O’Neill’s abiding loves: literature,
turn-of-the-twentieth-century popular music, and slang. As an adolescent,
O’Neill read all the literature referred to in the play—and there’s a lot of
it, from Omar Khayyam (whose Rubiyat inspired the title), Algernon Charles Swinburne, George
Bernard Shaw, Oscar Wilde, and Rudyard Kipling, to the anarchist writings of
Emma Goldman, to the dime novel exploits of detective Nick Carter and George
Peck’s Bad Boy. Every summer he read the novels of Alexandre Dumas, Victor
Hugo, and Charles Dickens, the philosophy of Ralph Waldo Emerson, and the
poetry of Lord Byron. Like Ah, Wilderness!’s
Arthur, the teenaged O’Neill, for all
his reading, was much less worldly than he knew; he believed that Oscar Wilde
went to prison for the unspeakable crime of bigamy.
Everyone sang or played an instrument at home and on social
occasions in early-twentieth-century America, and this domestic pleasure was
dear to O’Neill’s heart. He filled his plays with snatches of songs; according
to the O’Neill scholar Travis Bogart, only 8 of his 31 full-length plays are
without music. Ten songs are heard or referenced in Ah, Wilderness!; one of
them, “Bedelia,” is plunked out on a player-piano at the Pleasant Beach House
Hotel in Act III. After the play opened to great success, Carlotta surprised
him with a like instrument; allegedly, it had once graced the parlor of a New
Orleans bordello. O’Neill named it Rosie and would sit at it for hours at a
time, singing happily along. In one of the few photographs that show O’Neill with
a smile, he sits contentedly at Rosie, hands splayed across the keys. According
to Bogart, once O’Neill had settled into his last home, Tao House, in the hills
above Danville, California, on warm summer nights residents for miles around
could hear Rosie cranking out, “She’s the Sunshine of Paradise Alley”.
O’Neill may have strained for a tragic language, but the
slang of his youth, like the music, flowed from him freely. It’s even more
ubiquitous in his plays than music. The slang he used came almost exclusively
from the first decade of the twentieth century, and he used it in plays,
letters and everyday speech, long after it had gone out of fashion. In later
years, some critics wondered if he knew any contemporary idioms; on the other
hand, those who knew him would comment on the unique flavor the words lent his
speech.
Many of O’Neill’s themes and character types appear in Ah, Wilderness!: the young man at odds with
the world of his father, yearning for a mother figure and dreaming of illicit passion
with prostitutes (or, in O’Neillian parlance, “tarts”); the grasping, material
life of America versus the higher callings of love and self-sacrifice; the
divided nature of man’s soul. Here, though, they appear in a congenial
atmosphere. What in his other plays are the big thematic guns of tragedy are
rendered in Ah, Wilderness! as Fourth
of July firecrackers. Dark issues lurk, such as Uncle Sid’s drinking problem
and Lily’s lonely future and perpetual disappointments, but their implications
are the shadows, not the substance of the work.
Those shadows belonged to the true story of O’Neill’s youth,
which Ah, Wilderness! decidedly is
not. The play depicts, in his words, “the other side of the coin,” the family that
he wished he’d had: parents who love each other and care for their children,
and children who feel secure and loved, even while in full-blown, normal
adolescent rebellion. O’Neill’s own family—the self-involved father, tight with
money and love; the mother who disappeared into the spare bedroom to emerge in
a morphine haze; an elder brother who spent his days and nights in brothels and
bars on a life-long bender of guilt and self-loathing—is erased in this
telling.
Perhaps O’Neill had to imagine his youth in the fictional glow
of comedy before he could face his family’s tragic truths. He would depict
those with absolute courage and stark honesty in the masterpieces that came
later—Long Day’s Journey into Night,
set in the same (yet very different) house as Ah, Wilderness!, and A Moon
for the Misbegotten , which takes place just a few miles away on a piece of
property that his father owned. Playwrights write the plays they need to write.
Ah, Wilderness! is O’Neill’s most
popular and most produced play. Even if it weren’t, the fact that it laid the
groundwork for the last great ones makes it one of America’s most significant
plays, too.