Puck’s Eye View

-
Posted by Stephen Buescher, Head of Movement and Physical Theater in the A.C.T. Master of Fine Arts Program
Stephen Buescher teaches movement and physical theater in the A.C.T. Master of Fine Arts Program but has never performed in an A.C.T. production. Now, for the final M.F.A. Program production of the season—featuring the outgoing class of 2012, whom he has spent the past three years training—he takes to the stage alongside his students, playing Puck in a wildly romantic take on Shakespeare's A Midsummer Night's Dream at The Costume Shop, A.C.T's intimate new performance space.
Edward Budworth
Stephen Buescher in rehearsal for A Midsummer Night's Dream with Master of Fine Arts Program student Rebekah Brockman. Photo courtesy Rebekah Brockman.


It all began with [Midsummer director and A.C.T. Associate Artistic Director] Mark Rucker saying, "Stephen, I have a crazy idea!" Then he proceeded to ask me if I was interested in playing Puck in Midsummer.
Ooooooooh! Puck!!! I have wanted to play that role forever. I ran home (via BART), and asked my wife Emilia what she thought. She thought it would be great for me to perform at A.C.T. I asked my kids, and they were excited that they would get to see Pappa in a show. All is well.
Wait a minute.
That means I have to perform with my students. Uh-oh . . . that means I may have to practice what I have been preaching. Uh-oh . . . I haven't spoken any Shakespeare in 20-plus years. I was secretly looking for a way to back out, but some of the tenets of my teaching are "take risks" and "put yourself in an uncomfortable position."
<Gulp>.
Here we go!
I remember being so nervous at the first table reading of the play. I felt like that driver’s education student who puts both hands on the wheel and holds on waaaaay too tight. My fears were soon assuaged. The M.F.A. Program students made me feel at home right off the bat. It was clear to me, in that moment, how at ease they were in the work. It was great to see how they owned the space, the play, the language, and their choices. They were clearly in the practice of the craft . . . and I was clearly (at least in my mind) out of practice.
I also remember watching them rehearse.
They would go for a while in a scene, stop . . . go back . . . stop . . . go back, stop . . . until they landed on something they wanted to stay with. WHAT!? You can't do that. Can you do that? You didn't have to ask the director if you could go back, you just kept going back? Hmmmm, can I do that? I was always under the impression that you keep going until the end, make a mental note of what needs some work, and then NEXT time, you try and change it. This was a whole new idea for me. Witnessing them rehearse in that way has given me permission to try it in rehearsal as well (but hopefully not during the show . . . ).
The other major impression on me was how much this group felt like a company. There is a trust and a sense of knowing, which allowed them to touch, kiss, lift, hit, slap, and jump on each other, all with no self-consciousness. What's more, they directed each other, which is often considered taboo. An actor would get an idea and then articulate the idea to their scene partner. The idea would usually involve the scene partner responding in a certain way. For example, "I want to try this exit, so when I say this line, will you block my way so that I have to go around you, and then say your line and then I will come back to you and kiss you?" This happened throughout the rehearsal process and people were always willing to try the idea. It made me, yet again, value what happens when people work together over time.
It has been an amazing experience for me to be able to play with the third-year students, and more recently, with the second-year students as well, as they have joined the fairy ranks! But enough of this learning-from-students crap. I can't wait to get them all back in class so that I can tell them what to do!

Popular posts from this blog

“To Be or Not to Be”: The Iconic Speech’s Origins, Interpretations, and Impact

-
Image
By A.C.T. Publications Staff The opening line of Hamlet ’s “To be or not to be” soliloquy is theater’s most iconic, most referenced quote. What’s less known is the famous speech’s history, with Hamlet ’s earliest publications offering varying versions of its language. Also questioned is its meaning—is Hamlet contemplating suicide or is he weighing the consequences of murder? Though definitive answers are unlikely to arise, the questions “To be or not to be” asks have kept audiences, scholars, and actors engaged for centuries. Hamlet ’ s "To be or not to be" speech as it appears in the three original editions of the play. Photo by Georgelazenby. Courtesy Wikimedia Commons. The first edition, or First Quarto (Q1), of Hamlet was published in 1603. Because the text is much shorter than later editions and its language is less poetic, it is nicknamed the “Bad Quarto” by scholars. “To be or not to be” in Q1 reads as: To be, or not to be—ay, there’s the point. To die,
Read more

The American Sound: The Evolution of Jazz

-
Image
By Cecilia Padilla There is nothing so uniquely American as jazz music. In its simplest form, jazz embodies the essence of the American people: bold and inventive. The improvisation of the jazz ensemble can even be seen as a metaphor for the American democratic ideal: musicians playing solos have the liberty to express themselves as long as they adhere to the overall structure of the tune—individual freedom but with responsibility to the group. The evolution of jazz music also carries with it the social development of our nation from slavery to the swinging songs of World War II. Musically, jazz contributed immensely to the way contemporary musicians approach instrumentation, composition, and vocal arrangements. It is difficult to find a popular tune today that does not derive from such jazz icons as Joe Oliver, Louis Armstrong, Duke Ellington, and Thelonious Monk. Jazz is the great equalizer; for more than a hundred years, it has been the common ground between blacks and whites, me
Read more

A Hell of a Businessman: A Biography of Joe Glaser

-
By Simon Hodgson Born in 1897, Joe Glaser was the son of a successful Russian Jewish physician in Chicago. He originally intended to follow a similar career and entered medical school, but after passing out in the operating room, he realized he wasn’t cut out to be a doctor. He started off in business selling used cars, but found better luck managing prizefighters. In his biography of Al Capone, Laurence Bergreen notes, “Glaser’s power to fix fights earned him a reputation as a sage of boxing, especially among reporters.” With advanced word as to which fights were fixed, Glaser could predict the results—and even the number of rounds—of many bouts in Chicago. His connections with organized crime continued in his next career change, when he began running nightclubs and whorehouses in the South Side for the Chicago Outfit, the powerful underworld gang led by Capone. Glaser’s tendency toward illegal action nearly ended his career. In 1928, he was sentenced to ten years in prison for
Read more